Stop trusting black-box AI verdicts. Ockams turns every AI decision into a transparent jury deliberation—multiple models reason independently, their process is cryptographically auditable, and consensus is reached probabilistically. Built for lawyers who demand evidence, not promises.
Every AI system (ChatGPT, Harvey, Legora) hands down verdicts like a solitary judge—you get a conclusion without transparency, deliberation, or the ability to audit the reasoning process.
One AI model makes critical decisions. No deliberation, no cross-examination, no way to audit whether its reasoning was sound.
You get conclusions without seeing the thought process. Impossible to verify if the AI considered all relevant factors or made logical errors.
Traditional ensemble methods aggregate votes but provide no cryptographic proof that consensus was reached honestly or transparently.
Explainable AI generates justifications after the fact. Like asking a judge for their reasoning after sentencing—no guarantee it matches what actually happened.
Ockams introduces a jury system for AI: multiple independent models deliberate, their reasoning is cryptographically recorded, consensus is reached probabilistically, and the entire process is auditable.
We're not building another AI tool—we're codifying the jury system for machines. Multi-party deliberation with cryptographic evidence.
Multiple AI models reason separately on the same input—no collusion, no shared biases. Each "juror" processes the evidence independently.
Models share their reasoning, challenge each other's conclusions, and refine their positions through iterative deliberation—exactly like a jury.
Every step of the deliberation is recorded with cryptographic commitments. Audit who said what, when they said it, and how consensus emerged.
Consensus emerges organically through statistical convergence. Outliers are detected. Confidence is measurable. No single model's bias determines the outcome.
Where every decision needs a defense and every reasoning process must stand up in court.
Multiple AI models independently analyze contracts, deliberate on risk, and produce auditable consensus—show regulators exactly how your AI identified risks.
Jury deliberation for M&A and transactional work. Document analysis with transparent reasoning trails that hold up under scrutiny.
Regulatory reviews that regulators can actually review. Cryptographic proof of how your AI concluded a practice was compliant—or flagged it.
Case law analysis where you can audit which precedents each model considered, how they weighed factors, and why consensus emerged.
Here's exactly what happens when you upload a contract tomorrow.
Drag and drop your NDA, MSA, or vendor agreement. We support PDF, Word, and text formats. Your documents stay encrypted and never train our models.
GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and other specialized models each read the contract separately. No model sees another's analysis—zero collusion, zero shared biases.
Models share their findings and challenge each other's interpretations. Each cycle refines positions. You watch consensus emerge in real-time via our live dashboard.
Every reasoning step gets committed cryptographically. The transcript proves who analyzed what, when they analyzed it, and how consensus was reached. Downloadable as proof.
Risk assessment with confidence scores. Red flags with reasoning trails. Compliance check with cryptographic proof. Defensible in front of partners, clients, and regulators.
